Insights

A Comprehensive Look at Building Safety Regulations and Florida Milestone Inspections

J.S. Held’s Inaugural Global Risk Report Examines Potential Business Risks & Opportunities in 2024

Read More close Created with Sketch.
Home·Insights·Articles

Florida Chapter 2023-203: Ensuring Building Safety in the Wake of Tragedies

It often takes a crisis for society and government to react. Whether it be seat belts, smoking, or building safety, unfortunately, catastrophe can move the needle toward addressing public safety issues. This paper explores the events leading up to Florida Chapter 2023-203, the steps that impacted owners/developers/managers can take to ensure compliance, and how experts can help.

The Catalysts: Tragic Building Collapses in Florida’s History

On August 5, 1974, at 10:24 AM [1], a federal office building housing the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Miami Field Division office in downtown Miami, Florida collapsed after the roof caved in, causing the deaths of seven DEA employees and injuries to 15 others.

The collapse led to Miami-Dade County's mandatory 40-year recertification program. The program aimed to avoid a similar collapse [2]. After an examination of the six tons of rubble left by the collapse, it was concluded that concrete buildings in South Florida have risks, including salt in the aggregate rock used when making concrete that can corrode reinforcing steel due to the area's humid climate and salty air. This corrosion can expand and crack the concrete, leaving rebar to lose contact with the surrounding material and reducing the concrete’s ability to withstand tensile forces [3], thereby increasing the risk of failure.

In 1981, a “five-story Harbour Cay Condominium building in Cocoa Beach, Florida, collapsed during the placement of concrete for the roof slab, killing 11 workers and injuring 23 more.” [4] In

response to this tragedy, the Florida Legislature instituted Threshold Building Inspections, requiring

licensed “Special Inspectors” to conduct inspections for all threshold buildings [5]. A threshold building, as defined by the Florida Building Code and in accordance with Florida Statute, is any building which is greater than three stories or 50 feet (15 240 mm) in height, or which has an assembly occupancy classification that exceeds 5,000 square feet (464.52 m2) in area and an occupant content of greater than 500 persons. A special inspector is a licensed Professional Engineer (PE) or Registered Architect (SA) who is certified under Florida Statute Chapters 471 or 481 to conduct inspections of threshold buildings.

In 1992, Hurricane Andrew exposed limitations to the Florida system of local codes. The hurricane destroyed many structures that were allegedly built according to the strongest codes at the time. Florida’s governor eventually appointed a study commission to review the system of local codes and make recommendations for modernizing the system. The 1998 Legislature adopted the study commission’s recommendations for a single state building code and enhanced the oversight role of the state over local code enforcement. The 2000 legislature authorized implementation of the Florida Building Code, and that first edition replaced all local codes on March 1, 2002 [6]. The current edition of the Building Code is the seventh, which is referred to as the 2020 Florida Building Code. The eighth edition of the Florida Building Code will go into effect statewide in Florida on January 1, 2024.

The Evolution of Building Safety Regulations in Florida

The Florida Building Code does not contain mandatory requirements for the maintenance and inspection of existing buildings in the state. Mandatory inspections of existing condominium buildings were once required by Florida law, but the law was repealed shortly after enactment. In 2008, the legislature mandated that every condominium greater than three stories in height be inspected for maintenance, useful life, and replacement costs of the common elements every five years by an engineer or architect licensed in the state [7]. A condominium association could waive this requirement for five years by a majority vote of interests present at a properly called meeting of the association [8]. This provision was repealed in 2010 [9].

The Champlain Towers South Collapse: A “Wake-Up Call”

On June 24, 2021, at approximately 1:22 AM EDT, Champlain Towers South, a 12-story beachfront condominium in the Miami suburb of Surfside, Florida partially collapsed, causing the deaths of 98 people. Four people were rescued from the rubble, but one died of injuries shortly after arriving at the hospital [10]. Eleven others were injured [11]. Approximately 35 were rescued the same day from the un-collapsed portion of the building [12], which was demolished 10 days later.

A contributing factor under investigation is long-term degradation of reinforced concrete structural support in the basement-level parking garage under the pool deck, due to water penetration and corrosion of the reinforcing steel. The problems had been reported in 2018 and noted as "much worse" in April 2021. A $15 million program of remedial works had been approved before the collapse, but the main structural work had not begun. Other possible factors include land subsidence, insufficient reinforcing steel, and corruption during construction [13][14][15]. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is investigating almost two dozen potential causes for the collapse. It is likely they will determine several factors that happened simultaneously to cause the collapse [16].

Senate Bill 4-D: A Step Toward Enhanced Building Safety

During the Special Session of the Florida Legislature in 2022, Senate Bill 4-D introduced by Senator Boyd provided building safety inspection requirements for condominium and cooperative association buildings, increased the rights of unit owners and prospective unit owners to access information regarding the condition of such buildings, and revised the requirements for associations to fund reserves for the continued maintenance and repair of such buildings [16]. The bill ultimately became law.

Regarding safety inspections for a building, the Act required a condominium or cooperative association building that is three or more stories in height to have a “milestone inspection” of the buildings’ structural integrity by an architect or engineer when a building reaches:

  • 30 years of age, and every 10 years thereafter, or
  • 25 years of age, and every 10 years thereafter if the building is located within three miles of a coastline.

Understanding the Provisions of Florida Chapter 2023-203

Eventually, Florida enacted 2023-203, otherwise known as a “clean up bill” which further defines the milestone inspections including, but not limited to, the following:

  • Revising the circumstances under which community association managers or management firms must comply with a specified provision.
  • Revising the definition of the terms “milestone inspection” and “substantial structural deterioration.”
  • Revising who must have milestone inspections performed for buildings.
  • Revising the deadline for milestone inspections of certain buildings.
  • Authorizing local enforcement agencies to make certain determinations relating to milestone inspections after a building reaches a specified age.
  • Authorizing local enforcement agencies to extend deadlines for milestone inspections under certain circumstances.
  • Authorizing local enforcement agencies to accept certain inspection reports under certain circumstances.
  • Deeming the inspections relating to such inspection reports a milestone inspection for certain purposes.
  • Revising costs that condominium and cooperative associations are responsible for.
  • Revising requirements relating to written notice of required inspections.
  • Requiring architects or engineers performing milestone inspections to submit a specified progress report to a local enforcement agency within a specified timeframe under certain circumstances and specifying that associations must distribute copies of certain inspection reports within a specified timeframe and in a specified manner.
  • Authorizing municipal governing bodies to adopt certain ordinances relating to association repairs.
  • Amending s. 718.103, F.S.; defining the term “alternative funding method.”
  • Revising the definition of the term “structural integrity reserve study.”
  • Revising requirements relating to budget meetings.
  • Revising condominium association reserve account requirements.
  • Revising requirements relating to waiving reserve requirements or providing less reserves than required by law.
  • Revising requirements relating to using reserve funds or interest accrued on reserve funds for certain purposes.
  • Revising requirements for structural integrity reserve studies and mandatory milestone inspections.
  • Revising requirements relating to maintenance, repair, and replacement of common elements and condominium property.
  • Revising the documents to which prospective purchasers are entitled when purchasing a condominium unit from a unit owner.
  • Requiring specified disclosures relating to milestone inspections, turnover inspection reports, and structural integrity reserve studies for certain contracts entered into after a specified date.
  • Revising rights relating to the official records of a cooperative association and providing maintenance requirements for cooperative associations.
  • Revising requirements relating to budget procedures.
  • Revising cooperative association reserve account requirements.
  • Revising requirements relating to waiving reserve requirements or providing fewer reserves than required by law.
  • Revising a prohibition on using reserve funds or interest accrued on reserve funds for certain purposes.
  • Revising requirements for structural integrity reserve studies and mandatory milestone inspections as well as providing applicability and conforming provisions to changes made by the act.
  • Amending s. 719.301, F.S. and revising items that developers are required to deliver to an association upon relinquishing control of the association.
  • Amending s. 719.503, F.S. and revising the types of documents developers are required to provide to prospective buyers and lessees.
  • Revising the documents to which a prospective purchaser is entitled when purchasing an interest in cooperative from a unit owner, and requiring specified disclosures relating to milestone inspections, turnover inspection reports, and structural integrity reserve studies for certain contracts entered into after a specified date.

Additionally, if a building reached 30 years of age before July 1, 2022, the building’s initial milestone inspection must be performed before December 31, 2024. If a building reaches 30 years of age on or after July 1, 2022, and before December 31, 2024, the building’s initial milestone inspection must be performed before December 31, 2025.

If the date of issuance for the Certificate of Occupancy is not available, the date of issuance of the building’s Certificate of Occupancy shall be the date of occupancy evidenced in any record of the local Building Official. This can be in the form of inspection records or an electrical release that first allowed electrical power to be energized to the building.

Broward and Miami Dade counties have already approved requirements even stricter than 2023-203. Other localities have either approved or are considering similar requirements.

Adoption Into the Florida Building Code: Existing Building Volume

Following statutory adoption, the regulations related to the milestone inspections were approved for inclusion into the 2023 8th Edition Florida Building Code: Existing Building volume in April 2024. These begin with administrative citation in Chapter 1 such as the following:

101.2 Scope. The provisions of the Florida Building Code, Existing Building shall apply to the repair, alternation, change of occupancy, addition to and the relocation of existing buildings. The provisions of the Florida Building Code, Existing Building shall also apply to existing buildings that are subject to Milestone Inspections, as defined in Chapter 2 and as required in Chapter 18

The aforementioned citation identifies the Milestone Inspection requirement and indicates it has now become a defined term in the Florida Building Code.

Milestone Inspection. Means a structural inspection of a building, including an inspection of load-bearing elements and the primary structural members and primary structural systems as those terms are defined in s. 627.706, Florida Statutes, by an architect licensed under Chapter 481, Florida Statutes or engineer licensed under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes, authorized to practice in this state for the purposes of attesting to the life safety and adequacy of the structural components of the building and, to the extent reasonably possible, determining the general structural condition of the building as it affects the safety of such building, including a determination of any necessary maintenance, repair, or replacement of any structural component of the building. The purpose of such inspection is not to determine if the condition of an existing building is in compliance with the Florida Building Code or the fire safety code. The milestone inspection services may be provided by a team of professionals with an architect or engineer acting as a registered design professional in responsible charge with all work and reports signed and sealed by the appropriate qualified team member.

With the inclusion into the FBC, the process for the Milestone Inspections has been codified and the local Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) often recognized as the building department now has the authority to enforce the process.

Forms for exact documentation have been created by the state; however, some jurisdictions are accepting reports from inspection firms or similar documentation if the pertinent information is provided in the report. We recommend inquiring with the local AHJ as to what is required or being accepted prior to performing any of these inspections.

Steps to Comply with Florida Statue 2023-203

As mentioned, if you have a type of building listed that is a condominium or cooperative association receiving its certificate of occupancy before July 1st, 1992, then you must have a milestone inspection by December 31st, 2024. Other building types may have a stricter requirement, especially if situated in Broward or Miami-Dade Counties.

The latest inclusions to the Florida Existing Building Code volume identify this and the potential ramifications in Section 113.6:

113.6 Failure to Timely Submit the Milestone Inspection Report. If an owner or association of a building or structure fails to timely submit the building milestone inspection report to the Building Official or seek an extension request, the Building Official shall elect the choice of either a Special Magistrate or Code Enforcement Board as set forth under Florida Statutes, Section 162, et al., to conduct a hearing to address such failure. In the event an owner fails to comply with the repair and/or modification requirements as determined from the milestone inspection report as set forth herein, the structure may be deemed to be unsafe and unfit for occupation. Such findings shall be reviewed by the building official and shall be sent to the Special Magistrate, Code Enforcement Board, or Unsafe Structures Board, as appropriate.

These inspections are provided by a licensed architect licensed under chapter 481 or engineer licensed under chapter 471. Note that if your building falls within the stated definition of a “threshold building,” additional qualifications for the inspector prevail. As a part of their assessment, an inspector will put together either a remediation plan or a declaration that the building is safe. This can then be submitted to the authority having jurisdiction (usually the local building official) to fulfill this obligation. If issues are found during the inspection, then program managers can work with owners, developers, property managers, etc., to scope out the work, put together project teams, and so on. Independent project monitors (owners’ reps) may also be hired as consultants to oversee the work, coordinate the various contractors, and ensure everything is done according to specifications.

Associations must fund reserves for the continued maintenance and repair of buildings to cover the cost of any necessary work to be done. Forensic accountants can conduct structural integrity reserve studies to help ensure compliance and appropriate funding is available.

If you have questions about these steps, feel free to contact:

Dave Rosenof | Project Monitoring
[email protected]

Michelle Feduccia | Forensic Engineering – Florida
[email protected]

Jennifer Engle | Forensic Accounting
[email protected]

Conclusion

F.S. 2023-203 and the latest adopted Florida Building Code inclusions may be construed as a “draconian” measure to bring buildings to their appropriate safety standards, but, besides the obvious preservation of life and property, the law(s) must be taken seriously for their potential financial and personal liability impacts. Working with the right partner is key for liability, financial and life safety reasons.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our colleagues Gibson Jones, R.A., AIA, NCARB; Andrew Lovenstein, PE, SI; Michael Rimoldi, MPA, CBO, CFM, CBC; and Dave Rosenof, MBA, CGC, PMP, LEED AP for providing insight and expertise that greatly assisted this research.

Gibson Jones is a Senior Architect in J.S. Held’s Forensic Architecture & Engineering practice. His professional background consists of over 25 years of experience in the following various roles: schematic design, site planning, design development, production, project management, and construction administration. Mr. Jones has experience with residential developers, private residential clients, public entities, commercial developers, planning and zoning departments, building departments, city commissions, general contractors, financial institutions, and various consultants across all aspects of project development. Mr. Jones has applied this knowledge to assignments concerning construction defects, property condition assessments, construction litigation, sources of moisture, premise liability, and building envelope issues associated with roof, windows, doors, stucco, and waterproofing details.

Gibson can be reached at [email protected] or +1 786 244 2740.


 


 

Andrew Lovenstein is a Senior Engineer in J.S. Held’s Forensic Architecture & Engineering practice. He has extensive experience evaluating the structural condition of existing buildings. The structures evaluated have ranged from very large commercial buildings to storage sheds for residential homes. The buildings being evaluated have had assembly, commercial, business, residential, hazardous, storage and institutional occupancies. The types of evaluations include both destructive testing and non-destructive testing methods. Andrew has extensive knowledge of both current and archaic building systems and materials. He has performed building evaluations after hurricane, flood, fire, vehicle impact, mold, hidden moisture intrusion, and sinkhole activity. Andrew has also done evaluations on undamaged buildings as part of real-estate transactions, change of occupancy or use, and has performed many feasibility studies for additions to existing buildings.

Andrew can be reached at [email protected] or +1 786 244 2753.


 

Michael Rimoldi is a Senior Project Manager in J.S. Held’s Forensic Architecture & Engineering practice. In addition to applying and interpreting the building codes, Michael is a licensed building contractor who has worked on both residential and commercial projects of various scopes. He is an ASFPM Certified Floodplain Manager and a credited reviewer of several FEMA construction-related documents including the Coastal Construction Manual, the Local Officials Guide to Coastal Construction and Natural Hazards and Sustainability for Residential Buildings. He has appeared on several national media outlets discussing building codes and construction including CNN, Good Morning America, and The Weather Channel.

Mike can be reached at [email protected] or+1 813 676 1050.

 

Dave Rosenof is a Vice President in J.S. Held’s Construction Advisory practice. Dave is a construction professional with over 40 years’ experience serving in diverse roles including superintendent, estimator, project engineer, project manager, project executive, vice president of operations, and general contractor. He has been responsible for over $1.5B of construction in both Ohio and Florida. Dave’s projects have included more than a dozen market sectors including public assembly, government, education and higher education, warehouse, manufacturing, multifamily (mid and high-rise), high-end residential, office, retail, hospitality, religious, and recreational. Delivery methods have included CM at Risk, cost plus, design-build, master agreement, performance contracting, preconstruction, and lump sum. Dave is responsible for preconstruction, contract negotiations, and deal structuring as an advocate for owners.

Dave can be reached at [email protected] or +1 239 426 5535.

References

[1] "The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Years 1970–1975" (PDF). DEA.gov. United States Department of Justice. p. 36.

[2] Blaskey, Sarah; Cassidy, Dana (June 30, 2021). "Have buildings spontaneously collapsed before? Yes, but it's a short list". Miami Herald.

[3] Staletovich, Jenny (June 25, 2021). "After A DEA Building Collapsed In 1974, Engineer Created Recertification Program To Prevent Future Disasters". WUSF Public Media.

[4] National Institute of Standards and Technology, Harbour Cay Condominium Collapse Florida 1981, available at https://www.nist.gov/el/harbour-cay-condominium-collapse-florida-1981

[5] Florida Building Commission, Florida Building Construction Standards available at https://www.floridabuilding.org/fbc/commission/FBC_0413/Commission_Education_POC/173/173-1-MATERIAL%20.pdf

[6] DBPR, Building Code Information System, at: https://floridabuilding.org/c/default.aspx#

[7] Ch. 2008-28, Laws of Fla.

[8] Id.

[9] Ch. 2010-176, s. 59, Laws of Fla

[10] Musgrave, Jane (July 9, 2021). "Teen boy was sitting beside his mom when Surfside building collapsed; family sues". The Palm Beach Post. Archived from the original on July 27, 2021.

[11] "Residents Rescued After Surfside Condo Building Partial Collapse: 'We Heard A Really Big Rumble'". CBS Miami. June 24, 2021. Archived from the original on June 24, 2021.

[12] "Condo Collapse: 'We Pulled 35 Occupants That Were Trapped; Rescue Operation Ongoing,' Miami-Dade Fire Rescue Officials". CBS Miami. June 24, 2021. Archived from the original on June 24, 2021. Retrieved June 24, 2021. Brown, Ann (July 7, 2021). "Corruption In North Miami Beach Could Be Factor In Surfside Building Collapse: 7 Things To Know". Moguldom. Archived from the original on July 16, 2021. Retrieved July 15, 2021.

[13] Grimm, Fred (July 2, 2021). "Surfside condo built in era tainted by corruption | Fred Grimm". South Florida Sun Sentinel. Archived from the original on July 14, 2021.

[14] Baker, Mike; LaForgia, Michael (August 25, 2021). "'They Were Bullies': Inside the Turbulent Origins of the Collapsed Florida Condo". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 25, 2021.

[15] Scouten, Ted (June 20, 2022). "NIST investigators give update on Surfside condo collapse investigation: "We haven't ruled anything out"".

[16] Chapter 2022-269, Laws of Fla.

Find your expert.

This publication is for educational and general information purposes only. It may contain errors and is provided as is. It is not intended as specific advice, legal, or otherwise. Opinions and views are not necessarily those of J.S. Held or its affiliates and it should not be presumed that J.S. Held subscribes to any particular method, interpretation, or analysis merely because it appears in this publication. We disclaim any representation and/or warranty regarding the accuracy, timeliness, quality, or applicability of any of the contents. You should not act, or fail to act, in reliance on this publication and we disclaim all liability in respect to such actions or failure to act. We assume no responsibility for information contained in this publication and disclaim all liability and damages in respect to such information. This publication is not a substitute for competent legal advice. The content herein may be updated or otherwise modified without notice.

noun_Download_747989_000000 Created with Sketch. Download PDF
You May Also Be Interested In
Perspectives

International Existing Building Code (IEBC): Demystifying Proper Application of the Code

When a damaged structure is being returned to service, confusion sometimes surrounds the question of which building codes to apply—the International Building Code (IBC), International Existing Building Code (IEBC), or the International Residential Code (IRC)?The...

Perspectives

Premises Liability & The Building Codes: The Role of Codes in Making Premises Safe

According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), “Building codes protect you from a wide range of hazards—whether it is by implementing safe wiring, fire prevention, or stronger structural integrity. When a community has up-to-date...

Perspectives

Storm Damage Repair Requirements: Identifying Damage & Applying the Building Code

When performing inspections of buildings or structures after a catastrophic event, such as a hurricane, several types of damage conditions may be encountered. The unpredictability of storms can present many challenges when determining how to...

 
INDUSTRY INSIGHTS
Keep up with the latest research and announcements from our team.
Our Experts