J.S. Held Strengthens Forensic Accounting and Financial Investigations Expertise and Expands Suite of Services in Canada with Acquisition of ADS Forensics
Read MorePre-Date of Loss anxiety or mental illness can have a profound impact on post-accident or injury recovery. In fact, long-term anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues can play a significant role in how an individual reacts to medical issues, injuries, and accidents. While mental health issues that were in place prior to date of loss (DOL) may not have contributed to the alleged injury, they can affect the individual’s response to the event or illness.
Underlying anxiety can heighten or exacerbate symptoms, making it more difficult to treat subjective complaints which, in turn, can prolong recovery post-DOL. Chronic anxiety can have serious consequences on both physical and mental health, irrespective of injuries.
This paper will examine specific issues surrounding the effects of prior mental health problems on recovery following the DOL of an accident or injury. The conclusions may be helpful to defense attorneys and claims adjusters seeking to mitigate the cost of a claim in a manner that is fair to all parties as well as to plaintiff lawyers who are seeking just compensation for their clients.
Long-term anxiety can cause the brain to release stress hormones on a regular basis. This can increase the frequency of certain symptoms, such as:
In the setting of pre-DOL anxiety and mental health issues, it’s important to determine just how extensive a role the underlying anxiety played in the individual’s recovery, or lack of recovery. Many subjective complaints reported after an injury could be related to anxiety and not to the event itself.
It is not unusual to see an individual with premorbid psychological issues be overtreated and to have additional subjective complaints, as opposed to an individual who does not have underlying illnesses. These individuals with prior problems often become hyper-focused on their symptoms, which not only can have an impact on the duration of care, but also can drive up the overall cost of the claim. Additionally, chronic pain, headaches, and stress are sometimes seen following an injury because of a person's premorbid state and coping skills.
Plaintiff attorneys often try to relate psychological issues to the injury. They sometimes give little or no consideration to a claimant’s underlying psychological issues prior to the event and whether these issues could potentially be driving the claim.
When allegations are made regarding exacerbation of psychological problems, it is imperative that psychotropic medications prescribed and any ongoing therapies both before and after the DOL are compared. If the claimant requires fewer medications post injury, this could potentially be a win for the defense team, as an argument could be made that the claimant did not require increased dosages of psychotropic medications. Additionally, no change (i.e., frequency) in therapy visits or providers may also show that there was no significant exacerbation of the claimant’s condition. Under these circumstances, therefore, the injury did not exacerbate the claimant’s psychological issues.
As both defense and plaintiff lawyers know, juries will award sizeable monetary damages for emotional harm caused by an accident. For those plaintiffs seeking compensation for emotional distress post-DOL, their lawyers should understand and acquire their client’s medical records and other measurable and evidence of emotional distress that can link the suffering to the incident.
Information can come from a variety of sources beside medical records:
At the same time, attorneys for plaintiffs need to tread cautiously in this area. By asking for damages for emotional distress – especially in significant amounts - they may be opening their clients to requests by defense counsel for past therapy and other medical records as well as for an independent medical examination. While not all emotional distress can be quantitated, much can be with careful review and analysis. With that in mind, plaintiff lawyers should take steps to protect their client’s right to privacy and seek to limit what mental and physical health history they must disclose to defense counsel.
Pre-injury psychological and psychiatric conditions may influence post-injury outcomes. Be aware of the conditions within the context of the event or injury. For instance, ask if the injury itself was stressful or could be considered stressful. If so, underlying conditions may worsen or exacerbate outcomes and related treatment.
As a result, several steps should be taken:
Finally, anxiety and stress may be deemed compensable, depending on the circumstances of the case. Nurse reviewers and consultants can help defense counsel, plaintiff counsel and claims adjusters determine the effect of premorbid conditions on recovery post-DOL.
We would like to thank Kari Williamson for providing insight and expertise that greatly assisted this research.
Kari Williamson leads J.S. Held’s Medical Bill Review & Nurse Consulting services. Kari is frequently invited to speak and publish as a leader in the legal nurse consultant field on emerging medical-legal and insurance claims issues, such as data mining, bill audits, medical reviews, internal or external medical assistance, claims education, and new ways to measure and improve outcomes. She writes for a variety of national and regional insurance and legal publications and often speaks to law firms, insurance groups, and other industry organizations.
Kari can be reached at [email protected] or +1 615 398 5229.
In partnership with Lockton, we have developed a playbook with measures to minimize cyber risk and guidance on mitigating disruptions when incidents occur....
In Part II of addressing cyber claims challenges, we identify gaps in coverage and quick fixes for a smoother claims process....
Learn more about how catastrophe-related perils like ingress/egress limitations and power outages can impact any business....