Construction Defect Insurance Claims

J.S. Held’s Inaugural Global Risk Report Examines Potential Business Risks & Opportunities in 2024

Read More close Created with Sketch.


Construction defect claims and cases are scenarios wherein physical loss or damage is claimed to be related to defective building elements that will require repair or replacement. Typical defect claims and cases will involve exterior building enclosures or the building structure. However, it is important to note they can also include other building systems such as electrical, mechanical, or plumbing. This article will focus on exterior building enclosures.

The cause of a defect can be related to design, use of incorrect or unapproved materials, defective materials, improper techniques, improper installation, or poor workmanship. In addition to repair or replacement of the defective building elements, the extent of the claim will likely involve repairs to other building elements that have been impacted by the defective elements or which will be impacted by the replacement or repairs.

Analysis of Construction Defect Claims

The proposed repairs to correct defective conditions can be extensive, including the replacement of the complete exterior enclosure system of the building (windows/glass, stucco, brick, etc.) and, in some cases, demolition and replacement of the entire building. In many cases, inspections and/or tests have been performed at representative locations to determine the extent, if any, of the defect and resultant damage. The claimed defect should be supported by detailed engineering analysis as a basis for any failures related to the defects that have occurred. The construction defect claims typically also include a repair estimate which should be supported by detailed quantities and unit prices. The basis for timing or age of the defect (or statute of limitations) can vary based on the location/state.

Depending on the defect issue and the claimed extent of damage, the construction defect claims can be quite broad and extensive, but the analysis of most defect claims will include an investigation of the defects and an analysis of the claimed costs.


To properly review construction defect claims, there are several parts of the claim that require thorough investigation. These key parts of the investigation include:

  • Verification of engineering basis for claimed defect, including cause of the claimed defect and original construction documents (if available). The investigation should also be conducted with an understanding of the construction techniques and industry standards that were acceptable during the timeframe in which the building elements were installed.
  • Inspection of the physical conditions may be required to verify original construction materials and methods of construction when construction documents are not available or lack sufficient detail.
  • Determination of the extent of the defect. Is it limited in its scope or are the defects widespread? Can defective parts be traced to defective batches and isolated to specific locations in the building? This portion of the investigation may include non-destructive investigation, destructive investigations, in situ testing of materials, and testing of removed

Cost Analysis

In order to perform an analysis of the (estimated?) cost to mitigate the defect and damages, the following steps are typically performed:

  • Verify proposed repair scenarios, including potential code upgrades, betterments, or repairs to elements that were not investigated/tested.
  • Verify repair estimate quantities for each element of the repair scope of work.
  • Verify repair estimate unit prices, markups, and contingency (if applicable).
  • Verify possible alternative reasons for the condition of the claimed defective elements including poor workmanship or lack of (or improper) maintenance and allocate those costs accordingly.

Additional Considerations

In some cases, if the engineering verification of the claimed defect results in a different or abbreviated repair scope of work, an independent repair estimate may be required to reflect this alternate scope of repairs. If singular or multiple policy periods are related to the defect damage in question, an allocation of the repair costs related to the specific time period(s) may be required.

In the cost analysis of the claim, it is also important to consider segregating (into individual “buckets”) the costs for repairing defects, resulting damages, repairs related to betterments, code upgrades, industry standard upgrades, and repairs related to typical building maintenance.

  • Consider replacing with like kind and quality where possible; however, newer methods may be more cost effective even though they may otherwise be considered betterments.


Construction defect insurance claims require investigative and design data to allow for proper estimating. The scope of repairs should be reviewed in detail to account for any betterments or upgrades in the proposed repair work. Detailed repair quantities should be developed in order to validate to amount of work for each repair element.


We would like to thank Granger Stuck and Jim Borders for providing insight and expertise that greatly assisted this research.

Jim Borders is a Managing Director in J.S. Held’s Builder’s Risk Practice. He is an exterior enclosure and façade expert with over 25 years specializing in the curtain wall and glazing industry and has experience working on numerous types of buildings across the U.S. including commercial, hospitals, research, stadiums, airports, hotels, residential, education, and governmental projects using typical curtain wall systems, cable suspended glazing systems, and custom fabricated glazing systems. Jim also performs contract management and negotiations, estimating, schedule development and analysis, design development, QAQC development and cost tracking and analysis, curtain wall performance mockups, design and incorporation of fire safing systems into curtain walls, and system failure analysis.

Jim can be reached at [email protected] or +1 206 895 9511.

Granger Stuck is an Executive Managing Director in J.S. Held’s Builder’s Risk Practice. His career spans more than 30 years as a construction industry professional, with more than $2.1 billion and 6.8 million square feet in successful construction projects for two of the nation’s top contractors. Granger has worked on numerous consulting projects and disputes involving delay claims, cost claims, and other construction related disputes. He focuses primarily on providing schedule analysis to determine project delay, analysis and estimating of costs, and litigation support.

Granger can be reached at [email protected] or +1 206 895 9501.

Find your expert.

This publication is for educational and general information purposes only. It may contain errors and is provided as is. It is not intended as specific advice, legal, or otherwise. Opinions and views are not necessarily those of J.S. Held or its affiliates and it should not be presumed that J.S. Held subscribes to any particular method, interpretation, or analysis merely because it appears in this publication. We disclaim any representation and/or warranty regarding the accuracy, timeliness, quality, or applicability of any of the contents. You should not act, or fail to act, in reliance on this publication and we disclaim all liability in respect to such actions or failure to act. We assume no responsibility for information contained in this publication and disclaim all liability and damages in respect to such information. This publication is not a substitute for competent legal advice. The content herein may be updated or otherwise modified without notice.

noun_Download_747989_000000 Created with Sketch. Download PDF
You May Also Be Interested In

Builder’s Risk Project Documentation: Why We Need It & How We Use It, Including Soft Costs and Business Interruption

Claims arising during the course of construction often involve many moving parts, including multiple parties actively engaged in the project, numerous contracts, unique schedule considerations, and various other documents specific to each project (i.e., engineering...


How Do Builder’s Risk Claims Differ from Property Damage Claims?

While there are some similarities between Builder’s Risk and Property Damage claims, there are also numerous differences in the way they are managed and evaluated. Some questions that often arise when a claim occurs on...


Builder's Risk - Measuring Delay

Measuring delay from a loss under a builder’s risk insurance policy is perhaps the most complicated of all time element measures in the claims world. Setting aside the numerous complex issues of coverage, builders risk...

Keep up with the latest research and announcements from our team.
Our Experts