Insights

ABCs Can Be A Prudent Alternative to Bankruptcy & Receivership

J.S. Held Acquires GLI Advisors, Strengthening Our Construction Project Support Services in the Western US and Hawaii

Read More close Created with Sketch.
Home·Insights·Articles

Introduction

An Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors (ABC) can be the most prudent fiduciary action by a distressed company’s board of directors. The benefits of ABCs compared to Chapter 7 and Chapter 11 bankruptcies, receiverships, and other out-of-court restructuring methods include:

  1. Speed: Out-of-court ABCs can be completed faster than a bankruptcy or receivership matter.
  2. Flexibility: The Assignee can utilize restructuring methods at will, such as negotiating with creditors or selling assets, to optimize outcomes.
  3. Cost: ABCs are far less expensive to implement than a bankruptcy due to efficiency and lower fees.
  4. Yield: The expediency and flexibility of ABCs typically result in greater net proceeds than other methods available.

Consider this recent engagement where Stapleton Group served as Assignee:

20% in Additional Proceeds Generated via ABC of $50MM International Textile Recycler

A $50 million, private equity-backed international textile recycling company with operations in the United States and Central America had become illiquid due to substantial increases in freight costs and a poor product mix from a new key supplier. It was out of compliance with loan covenants and lacked cash-on-hand to pay creditor obligations.

 

The ABC

In an effort to restructure the business, two operating facilities were sold with proceeds used to pay back the company’s secured lender in full, and a third was closed. The company’s board of directors then opted to wind-down operations through an ABC rather than continue funding operations.

As Assignee, our team discovered significant accounts receivable on the company’s books without a recovery plan, and the lack of a realistic budget with projected recovery for the company’s remaining creditors.

 

The Recovery

We successfully recovered an additional 20% over the amount generated by selling facilities by:

  • Engaging critical personnel and former management to assist with vendor negotiations and stringent expense management;
  • Vigilant accounts receivable A/R management to generate strong collections and cash flow for the ABC estate;
  • Identifying and pursuing miscellaneous assets for recovery; and
  • Negotiating payment plans to release critical assets of the estate for future sale and recovery.

The recovery through the ABC was used to pay down obligations to the second priority secured lender.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our colleague, Jake DiIorio, CTP, for his insights and expertise that greatly assisted this research.

Jake DiIorio, CTP, is a Managing Director in J.S. Held’s Strategic Advisory practice. He joined the company in October of 2024 as part of J.S. Held's acquisition of Stapleton Group. Jake is a seasoned restructuring expert and court-appointed fiduciary and is instrumental in resolving complex turnarounds, receiverships, and loan workouts for operating businesses and real estate entities. He designs and implements strategies to repair fractured relationships between debtors, creditors, and other stakeholders to achieve the best outcomes for all parties involved. Jake applies his extensive experience as a fiduciary to manage projects ranging from solvency analyses to comprehensive receiverships and Chapter 11 restructurings. Prior to joining the Stapleton Group, he was a senior auditor at Ernst & Young in New York, NY, specializing in valuation analysis for Fortune 500 companies across multiple industries.

Jake can be reached at [email protected] or +1 213 235 0609.

Find your expert.

This publication is for educational and general information purposes only. It may contain errors and is provided as is. It is not intended as specific advice, legal, or otherwise. Opinions and views are not necessarily those of J.S. Held or its affiliates and it should not be presumed that J.S. Held subscribes to any particular method, interpretation, or analysis merely because it appears in this publication. We disclaim any representation and/or warranty regarding the accuracy, timeliness, quality, or applicability of any of the contents. You should not act, or fail to act, in reliance on this publication and we disclaim all liability in respect to such actions or failure to act. We assume no responsibility for information contained in this publication and disclaim all liability and damages in respect to such information. This publication is not a substitute for competent legal advice. The content herein may be updated or otherwise modified without notice.

You May Also Be Interested In
Perspectives

The Case for Out-of-Court Winddowns

Out-of-court winddowns may be a preferred alternative over bankruptcy for private equity sponsors, lenders, and boards of directors....

Perspectives

Common Problems in Buy/Sell Agreements

Litigation support professionals are often asked to prepare valuations or various calculations based on the language in buy/sell agreements, operating agreements, and purchase agreements. These agreements often do not provide clear language as to how...

Perspectives

Examining the Uniform Commercial Real Estate Receivership Act in Shaping Arizona’s Real Estate Receiverships

This article examines the impact of the Uniform Commercial Real Estate Receivership Act (“UCRERA”) in Arizona and analyzes the important differences between UCRERA and Arizona's pre-UCRERA receivership process, as well as the potential legal issues...

 
INDUSTRY INSIGHTS
Keep up with the latest research and announcements from our team.
Our Experts